Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    New Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Logo Design Website

    Hey all

    I was wondering if I could get a site review and a bug check. Does anything just not seem right on your end? I am no where near happy with it so a "redo" is possible. What are you thoughts? Hire Logo

  • #2
    New to the CF scene
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Not bad.
    You are god at it,I shell contact if I need a Logo .

  • #3
    The fat guy next door VIPStephan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Halle (Saale), Germany
    Posts
    8,700
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 1,011 Times in 984 Posts
    Hmm, well, it looks a little “retro” in terms of design (like, late 1990’s, early 2000’s). First thing that comes to mind would be that, as logo design firm, you should probably have a catchy logo yourself first. Then, I see a lot of different typefaces and text colors there. Basically, it feels very cluttered and little consistent. Also, the text is much too small to be comfortable to read. As basic rule of thumb you shouldn’t go below 13px for the default font size (exceptions prove the rule). And lastly, nowadays, with wide support of CSS’s @font-face there is a much wider variety of fonts available for beautiful and outstanding website designs. Don’t be afraid to make use of that.

    Now, as everywhere there are exceptions, but a general rule of thumb is to have a maximum of two general typefaces in a design, one for headlines, and one for regular text. And these shouldn’t be any random two typefaces, they need to complement nicely. This is called font pairing. One example I find notable is the website of the Smashing Magazine where they have used Skolar as headline/introductory text typeface and Proxima Nova as regular typeface. I’ve come to the point where the typeface is the first thing I think about when creating a design (after doing the basic wireframe, of course).

    Then, on your website, the graphic with the three logos is redundant on the pages other than the home page. I suppose by then people know what they can get. And in fact, on my 13" laptop screen all I see when I go to a new page is that graphic and I’m wondering whether you have any content at all until I figure that I need to scroll down. And that “content below” comment? Clearly a sign that you’re having the wrong approach at guiding your users through your site. Also, half of the graphic can and should be regular text (like, HTML text, not part of a graphic). Text is the most important thing for search engines.

    Now, there’s still a lot to say about the overall layout but I haven’t got the time currently. Maybe I’ll do that some time later.

  • #4
    New Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    domnic0723 :
    Not bad.
    You are god at it,I shell contact if I need a Logo .
    I believe you meant "good", but thanks for the kind words.

    Hmm, well, it looks a little “retro” in terms of design (like, late 1990’s, early 2000’s). First thing that comes to mind would be that, as logo design firm, you should probably have a catchy logo yourself first. Then, I see a lot of different typefaces and text colors there. Basically, it feels very cluttered and little consistent. Also, the text is much too small to be comfortable to read. As basic rule of thumb you shouldn’t go below 13px for the default font size (exceptions prove the rule). And lastly, nowadays, with wide support of CSS’s @font-face there is a much wider variety of fonts available for beautiful and outstanding website designs. Don’t be afraid to make use of that.
    I was a bit back and forth on creating a catchy logo for myself. It's in the works as I want to put together some sort of marketable character if not recognizable symbol.

    I put together the initial splash pretty quickly and didn't realize that typeface was so all over the place. Colors was no doubt intentional and should be re-evaluated.

    I can see how it may be hard for some to read just as in a logo. I've corrected that and I've gone with base style until I find something that I like.

    Now, as everywhere there are exceptions, but a general rule of thumb is to have a maximum of two general typefaces in a design, one for headlines, and one for regular text. And these shouldn’t be any random two typefaces, they need to complement nicely. This is called font pairing. One example I find notable is the website of the Smashing Magazine where they have used Skolar as headline/introductory text typeface and Proxima Nova as regular typeface. I’ve come to the point where the typeface is the first thing I think about when creating a design (after doing the basic wireframe, of course).
    I am going to adapt this habit in my site design as well. Thanks for the tip!

    Then, on your website, the graphic with the three logos is redundant on the pages other than the home page. I suppose by then people know what they can get. And in fact, on my 13" laptop screen all I see when I go to a new page is that graphic and I’m wondering whether you have any content at all until I figure that I need to scroll down. And that “content below” comment? Clearly a sign that you’re having the wrong approach at guiding your users through your site. Also, half of the graphic can and should be regular text (like, HTML text, not part of a graphic). Text is the most important thing for search engines.
    I've got other unrelated sites that rank well, but most direct search what they look for and that's it(the gamet) so I was trying a different approach initially. I know how confusing this can be, but if they land on other pages I'd like to figure out a way to retain other than nav. I didn't run through quite yet on the useless image space and conversion. I took care of most of that and also removed splash from content areas.

    I appreciate the response!

  • #5
    New Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I've cleaned it up a bit. Thought about it as a logo design rather than a website design...I think I'm going to stick with this. What do you think?

  • #6
    New to the CF scene
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    That's a good try. But i find some SEO parameters are missing. If you are targeting organic results then this must be taken care of.

  • #7
    New Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Yesceeohhh . What do you mean take care of SEO parameters? I am targeting organic results, but I'm not sure what you are referring to with respect to SEO parameters.


  •  

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •